Translate

Friday, 2 May 2025

Why Can’t Governments Offer an Adaptable Minimum Wage?

 


Every day, millions of people around the world work tirelessly just to survive, not to thrive, not to prosper, but simply to keep their heads above water. 


Yet as supermarket shelves become more expensive, fuel prices surge, housing costs skyrocket, and new taxes quietly creep in, the one thing that doesn’t seem to rise with the same energy is the minimum wage.


Why is it that governments and their institutional bodies can raise taxes, fees, and prices overnight, sometimes by dollars, not cents, but when it comes to increasing the minimum wage, the process suddenly slows to a crawl or is brushed aside altogether?


The truth is harsh: there’s an imbalance in where the government places its interest.


A Two-Sided System


Governments often argue that raising the minimum wage is complex, that it risks inflation, pushes businesses to cut jobs, or disrupts market balance. 


But at the same time, these very governments actively push policies that increase the cost of living, whether through new taxes, higher utility costs, or regulations that make everyday goods and services more expensive.


Supermarkets, fuel companies, landlords, and businesses raise their prices regularly, sometimes daily, to keep up with global supply chain costs, profit targets, or investor demands. 


Meanwhile, government leaders seem perfectly willing to step in and increase funding, grants, and tax breaks for corporate bodies, ensuring the health of businesses and markets. 


But where is that same swift action when it comes to raising the minimum wage for workers struggling under those rising prices?


The Shadow of Corporate Influence


A deeper problem lies in the conflict of interest that often exists between governments and corporate bodies. 


Many government leaders or decision-makers are shareholders or maintain strong ties to large companies and industries. 


When these corporations come forward asking for bailouts, incentives, or regulatory changes to maximize profits, government ears are wide open. 


But when it’s everyday people, the essential workers, the single parents, the minimum wage earners, asking for help, the response is sluggish or noncommittal.


This corporate-government alliance can compromise rulings that should benefit the people. 


Why? Because shareholders, including government-linked ones, often profit more by keeping wages low and maintaining the status quo, while boosting business earnings and sales. 


In other words, the system is designed to protect corporate interests over human needs.


A Call for an Adaptable Minimum Wage


Given the ever-rising cost of living, we need a dynamic, adaptable minimum wage that adjusts alongside inflation, market pressures, and living costs. 


If governments can quickly increase tax rates or fund billion-dollar corporate programs, why can’t they also index wages to reflect economic realities for workers?


An adaptable minimum wage wouldn’t just help individuals survive, it would stimulate the economy from the bottom up. 


Workers with more money to spend drive local businesses, increase demand, and contribute to healthier, more balanced economic growth.


The People Deserve Priority


It’s time for governments to shift their focus


Instead of treating the working public as an afterthought, they should recognize that the backbone of every economy is its people, not just its corporations, investors, or shareholders. 


Without fair wages, rising costs will continue to squeeze families, deepen inequality, and strain social systems.


The question isn’t whether governments can provide an adaptable minimum wage, they absolutely can. 


The question is, why aren’t they willing? 


And the answer, too often, is tied to where their interests, and their profits lie.

No comments:

Post a Comment