Translate

Tuesday 6 November 2018

What! What? How Do You Say It As Not To Annoy Anyone?


Asking someone " What" seems to be a questionable word that is put into the wrong passage of felt words.

Someone once said that an individual was very unmannerly by just replying to them with " what? to a question that maybe they didn't hear or understand.

And I too was present at the proceedings, and I found no basic need to put a guilty verdict on anyone because I never do, as the reply I heard and felt was a mere innocent feed as to clarify the question being asked as it also serve to express a reference in the context.

And as far as I see it asking" what? Is part of the vocabulary, a questionable aspect of the way that one goes about trying to find out, understand or say it to make a point, a questioning detail of circumstance, procedure, questions etc.

Some Individuals say things but yet they don't understand the method of procedures as to go about validating and indentified what someone says and how they said it, as always some just try to put a guilty verdict on others.

My knowledge of understanding this mere word " what" that question a disposition is just an asking way of clarifying reasoning.

One can say that the attitude in which it is pronounced maybe a bit aggressive, but still that does not make anyone unmannerly, it just means that the Individual maybe annoyed at someone or something at that point of time of questioning and the forecast of answering depict the annoyance.

Some Individuals find all different kinds of things to put in the way of other's verbal composition, and to them it's always a problem, but sometimes the problem is the Individual that so falsely judge a person that just innocently reply to a question with a feeding word.

And those Individuals need to check themselves to see where the inflatration is coming from, as it may be the other way around if you get what I mean.

Some Individuals don't ever seemed to be able to distinguish or clarify things that they see, hear or feel and they are always trying to find a fault at everything someone said, done or received.

Yes! A guilty verdict they always try to apply.


Yes! Words can be felt, read, and understood, but if one is not conscious to the reading etc of procedural  processing how can they debate it's forthcoming?

No comments:

Post a Comment